Re: GGF's extensions to GSS in Public Comment
Nicolas Williams <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Apr 2004 12:33:51 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.cat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:21:51PM -0500, Von Welch wrote: > > > Someone who thinks that environment variables are a good idea probably > > has very little programming experience on Microsoft Windows platforms. > > For implementations that aren't integrated with the Kernel, I don't > think its a question of environment variables being a good idea or > not, it's a question of "what other choice do you have?" Oh, you have a choice: per-user credential stores instead of per-session credential stores. > Ideally, I agree - it would be nice we didn't have to use environment > variables and didn't have to mess with this. But since we do, it seems > like the best idea is to expose it so that it can be handled > reasonably. You don't have to use environment variables. Looks like you used them only because MIT krb5 did (and does). Nico -- -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list server. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email protected]