Re: Draft 0 of proposed charter
Nicolas Williams <[email protected]> Tue, 11 May 2004 15:54:22 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.cat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 03:37:20PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > Extensions may be published as separate drafts or > or included in a GSSAPI version 3. While version 2 of the GSSAPI may > be clarified, no backward incompatible changes may be made to this > version of the API. Right. It should be clear that many of these extensions are "optional" from the point of view of GSS-API v2 implementors. It should also be clear that, while in some cases we seek to make the use of mechanism-specific or platform-specific extensions more feasible (particularly in a mechglue environment) we mostly seek to do generic exntension work (plus mechanisms, like CCM). I believe most of your list can be summarized in a paragraph or two. Add to the list of work items to consider: - Guidelines for GSS-API mechanism designers - Guidelines for GSS-API application protocol designers Nico -- -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list server. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email protected]