Re: Document editors

>>>>> "Douglas" == Douglas E Engert <[email protected]> writes:

    Douglas> Sam Hartman wrote:
    >>  Are there any parties who would be willing to edit the base
    >> spec and C bindings if we do manage to have a WG?
    >> 
    >> If we don't have document editors, a lot of the proposed work
    >> is not possible.

    Douglas> As Nico points out we should have the BOF first, and we

I actually think we want to have most editors lined up by the time we
have a BOF.  Having attended a number of IETF BOFs, it tends to be
easier to get consensus to move forward if you know what you're going
to do and who is going to do it coming into the BOF.  But there is no
need to find editors today.

I asked mostly because if there was an obvious interested party it
would be nice to know.


    Douglas>     Douglas> need to invite people who we feel should be interested
    Douglas> even if they are not interested today.

I agree we should do as much as we can to get good attendance at the
BOF and to get all parties who should be interested involved.
-++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email protected]