Re: Document editors
Wyllys Ingersoll <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:23:28 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.cat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I wrote a SPNEGO implementation and am all too familiar with many of the problems and incompatibility issues that have been found. I might be able to take up the document editor position for SPNEGO, however, Im not sure if Im attending the San Diego meetings or not. -Wyllys Ingersoll Denis Pinkas wrote: >>> O, another proposed charter item is fixing SPNEGO if that doesn't get >>> done sooner. As you will recall the SPNEGO specification cannot be >>> implemented because it does not describe the encoding of the mechanism >>> oid sets to be included in the MIC. IN addition there is significant >>> desire to document implementation errors Microsoft made. >> >> >> >> Further, we need a strategy for moving from broken SPNEGO to correct >> SPNEGO. > > > I have been the lead editor of SPNEGO. I shifted my interest into other > areas, so I am not willing to continue as lead editor. However, since it > is some how one of my babies, I would appreciate reviewing the document > and thus continue as co-editor. > > Just to let you know that the place of lead editor for SPNEGO is vacant. > > Denis > >> Nico > -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list server. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email protected]