Re: KITTEN BOF at IETF 60?
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Mar 2004 17:46:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.cat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Williams <[email protected]> writes: >> But my personal preference is to enhance channel bindings for >> cryptographic keys until they can (and are) portably used in >> GSSAPI V3 Nicolas> With IPsec we won't use cryptographic keys, after all. Nicolas> We'll use the IPsec initiator and responder IDs bound to Nicolas> the channel. I remain very concerned about this proposal but we'll discuss after you have text. What I meant was that I see channel bindings being used in the future to bind to cryptographic channels, not to bind to network addresses. -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list server. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email protected]