Re: KITTEN BOF at IETF 60?

--=-=-=


Martin Rex <[email protected]> writes:

> Sam Hartman wrote:
>> 
>> This is getting off topic for the list but it seems like linking
>> against the threads library may be one case where having unresolved
>> (weak) references in your shared object is acceptable.
>
> I strongly disagree.  This is cat-ietf!
>
> Multi-threading issues and how it might affect users of GSS-API
> and whether how one could standardize requirements for a
> thread-safe GSS-API v3 is well within scope of CAT--or whatever
> is left of it :)

Of course CAT can just put on threads and instead make a multi reentrant
enabled interface. The would put the thread issue back in the user, but if
the user doesn't shared object between threads, there is no issue.

Love


--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUAQGG6F3W+NPVfDpmCAQJgHggApm/Yz5t+iQNV2WGA06v5mRXpNK55VehB
0WwlZ7EI2QcN3sXliYrtAE9TXf/iQq6vxGItgto01n2KVjCX39embhbqz+3lVB3i
StMS79xT2wZD5QJtNvjFd8VpXk6rSaayB/mFHkw+7VVjnhhSY1Y99f8vdTjiL1Sd
0PSYMRxBSjBaHIP8xH8BdaiD0jDAEJm0grHQlqUUFvepj8HP/CtheEyMqLiX03mj
fOznfw/v9F54nvQK16ArLQ/BZXkS4bmfR/dhcuWG5YBtY3G8p/SagT8fSezGBbs6
A98r6eymciTtzg9PMaR25ln5LWfHxQtBPX7HzbXX0mHQtw8QZqPWYA==
=dqe2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
-++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email protected]