Re: [inventory-yang] poll for network inventory base model

Alexander L Clemm <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Sep 2023 13:49:16 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.opsawg,gmane.ietf.ccamp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I think that options 1 and 2 are closer than we think and can be aligned 
if we can agree on getting rid of the network-hardware-inventory 
container object that is defined in draft-ietf-ccamp-network-inventory.  
This will allow us to move forward quickly with a model for network 
hardware inventory, as required by ccamp, while preserving the option 
for a model that can be generalized and extended to incorporate other 
types of inventory, as desired by ivy.  I'll describe a bit more details 
in a separate email in order to not distract from the poll.

I guess this makes me a proponent of option 3, but with the caveat that 
this would not need to restart from scratch.  Instead it can be derived 
in very straighforward manner from the existing models with these slight 
alignments as described.  I am also sure that a lot of the existing text 
can be salvaged.

--- Alex

On 8/27/2023 11:21 PM, maqiufang (A) wrote:
>
> Hi Working Group,
>
> It’s now time to start considering how to move forward with the 
> inventory base model. We have two different documents that could be 
> used as a starting point for our work or, in case the working group 
> believes none of them is “good enough”, we can start a brand new ID.
>
> In case the latter option is chosen, Daniele and I will write a -00 
> version including just the table of content and what we’d like to be 
> covered in each section. The document will then be handed over to a 
> pool of authors which will bring it till the WG adoption.
>
> Hence, we will have a 3 weeks polling starting today. We decided to 
> make it a bit longer than usual because this time the working group is 
> requested to review two drafts instead of one.
>
> This mail starts a 3 weeks polling, terminating on September 15^th , 
>  where we would like the working group to express your preference among:
>
>  1. Adopt draft-ietf-ccamp-network-inventory-yang-02 in IVY and evolve
>     it to become the network inventory base model
>  2. Adopt draft-wzwb-opsawg-network-inventory-management-03 in IVY and
>     evolve it to become the network inventory base model
>  3. Start a brand new document from scratch as described above
>
> In the week after the closure of the polling (between September 18 and 
> 25) we will have an IVY interim meeting to discuss the issues/concerns 
> raised during the polling ( A separate mail will be sent).
>
> Thank you,
>
> Qiufang and Daniele
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg