RE: Not in Yokohama?

"Abbie Barbir" <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:03:02 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.cdi
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C212FC.2D8C53E8
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

i will be able to attend

abbie


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Cooper [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:25 PM
> To: Martin May; [email protected]
> Cc: Mark Day
> Subject: RE: Not in Yokohama?
> 
> 
> --On Thursday, June 13, 2002 17:55 +0200 Martin May 
> <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> > Mark,
> >
> > I also expect to be in Yokohama and I think we should have 
> our meeting.
> > However, it would be nice to know who plans to attend.
> >
> > Martin
> 
> I can't be there, but I'd echo Mark's earlier comments - I've 
> not seen any 
> (much) new activity that suggests that a face-to-face meeting 
> is necessary 
> at this point.  (Unless there have been design team meetings 
> going on and 
> they need face-to-face time?)
> 
> >
> > -> -----Original Message-----
> > -> From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf
> Of -> Mark Day
> -> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 04:32 PM
> -> To: [email protected]
> -> Subject: Not in Yokohama?
> ->
> ->
> -> Although we have made some useful progress in the group (forwarding the
> -> model, scenarios, and known-mechanisms drafts to the IESG) I
> -> have not seen
> -> much activity lately that would suggest that we should be meeting at
> the -> next IETF get-together.  In particular, the only new draft has
> been Dave -> Frascone's AAA work, which has drawn little comment.
> ->
> -> I have received informal indications from some people that they
> -> are unlikely
> -> to be able to attend even if we arrange a slot for a WG meeting.
> ->
> -> I expect to be in Japan anyway for other WGs, so I don't mind
> -> which way we
> -> decide.  But my current sense is that CDI will not be meeting in
> -> Yokohama.
> -> If you feel otherwise, this is your opportunity to convince me, Phil,
> and -> the rest of the group into shifting the rough consensus I currently
> -> perceive.
> ->
> -> --Mark
> ->
> ->
> ->
> ->
>
>
>
>




------_=_NextPart_001_01C212FC.2D8C53E8
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2655.35">
<TITLE>RE: Not in Yokohama?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>i will be able to attend</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>abbie</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; From: Ian Cooper [<A HREF="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:25 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; To: Martin May; [email protected]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Cc: Mark Day</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Subject: RE: Not in Yokohama?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; --On Thursday, June 13, 2002 17:55 +0200 Martin May </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; &lt;[email protected]&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; &gt; Mark,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; &gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; &gt; I also expect to be in Yokohama and I think we should have </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; our meeting.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; &gt; However, it would be nice to know who plans to attend.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; &gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; &gt; Martin</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; I can't be there, but I'd echo Mark's earlier comments - I've </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; not seen any </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; (much) new activity that suggests that a face-to-face meeting </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; is necessary </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; at this point.&nbsp; (Unless there have been design team meetings </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; going on and </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; they need face-to-face time?)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; &gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; &gt; -&gt; -----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; &gt; -&gt; From: [email protected] </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>[<A HREF="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</A>]On Behalf</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Of -&gt; Mark Day</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 04:32 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; To: [email protected]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; Subject: Not in Yokohama?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; Although we have made some useful progress in the group (forwarding the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; model, scenarios, and known-mechanisms drafts to the IESG) I</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; have not seen</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; much activity lately that would suggest that we should be meeting at</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; the -&gt; next IETF get-together.&nbsp; In particular, the only new draft has</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; been Dave -&gt; Frascone's AAA work, which has drawn little comment.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; I have received informal indications from some people that they</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; are unlikely</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; to be able to attend even if we arrange a slot for a WG meeting.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; I expect to be in Japan anyway for other WGs, so I don't mind</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; which way we</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; decide.&nbsp; But my current sense is that CDI will not be meeting in</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; Yokohama.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; If you feel otherwise, this is your opportunity to convince me, Phil,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; and -&gt; the rest of the group into shifting the rough consensus I currently</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; perceive.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt; --Mark</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt;</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C212FC.2D8C53E8--