RE: Comments on request-routing from IESG
"Abbie Barbir" <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:06:27 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.cdi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C8A3.740ED9F0 Content-Type: text/plain Hi, No problem, we will address the issues. abbie > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Day [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:41 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Comments on request-routing from IESG > > > Apparently we have some feedback on the request-routing draft > as of 1/15. I didn't know about it until I went looking for > the current state of our drafts. > > You can see the comments at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker> .cgi > Put in > "CDI" for WG acronym and hit "Search". Then hit > the "DETAIL" button for the known-request-routing draft. > > Abbie (and other interested parties), can you take a look at > what's there and see what we need to do to fix the identified > problems? > > Thanks, > > --Mark > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C8A3.740ED9F0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 5.5.2655.35"> <TITLE>RE: Comments on request-routing from IESG</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <BR> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Hi,</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>No problem,</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>we will address the issues.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>abbie</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> -----Original Message-----</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> From: Mark Day [<A = HREF=3D"mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</A>] </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:41 PM</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> To: [email protected]</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Subject: Comments on request-routing from = IESG</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Apparently we have some feedback on the = request-routing draft </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> as of 1/15. I didn't know about it until = I went looking for </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> the current state of our drafts.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> You can see the comments at </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> <A = HREF=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker" = TARGET=3D"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker</A>>= .cgi</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Put in </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> "CDI" for WG acronym and hit = "Search". Then hit </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> the "DETAIL" button for the = known-request-routing draft.</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Abbie (and other interested parties), can you = take a look at </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> what's there and see what we need to do to fix = the identified </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> problems?</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> Thanks,</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> --Mark</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> </FONT> </P> </BODY> </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C8A3.740ED9F0--