RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in c ollection

>    The issue is that RFC3253 doesn't define a method to switch off
>    version control on a resource, and therefore people are using
>    deletion on VHRs to switch off versioning (I couldn't find any
>    mention of this in the spec, though).
>
> I don't recall hearing of this approach, and don't see how it could be
> compatible with the spec, giving the DAV:delete-version-set
> postcondition.

Clarification: people use deletion of the VHR to both delete the VHR and
un-version-control the VCR. How would that violate the DELETE sematics for
VHRs?