RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in c ollection

"Julian Reschke" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.deltav
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Tim Ellison
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:18 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in
> c ollection
>
>
>
>
> Julian wrote:
>
> > b) the server deletes the VHR and un-version-controls the
> > VCR (to avoid breaking the live versioning properties).
>
> In what sense would the property be "broken"?  Clearly from the server's
> point of view there is a good reason why it may not want to so this, but
> from a protocol point I don't see a problem.  For example, what would be
> the difference if the version-history resource is unaccessible
> due to other
> circumstances, such as authentication or reachability?
>
> The semantics of a version-controlled resource can be enforced even if the
> version-history resource does not exist.

Even if both the resources referenced by  DAV:checked-in and DAV:checked-out
do not exist?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.