RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in c ollection
"Julian Reschke" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.deltav |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:05 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: error condition for delete of VHR when VCR is in checked-in > c ollection > > .. > In case b), there's no way a subsequent CHECKIN or CHECKOUT can > satisfy RFC3253's postconditions, so I'd consider this a broken > state. There shouldn't be a protocol-tolerated way to get into this > state, right? > > Which CHECKOUT/CHECKIN postconditions couldn't be satisfied? > I do agree that some operations could not succeed (e.g. UNCHECKOUT). You are right. CHECKIN/CHECKOUT would continue to work.