RE: DASL and DELTA-V properties

I agree with Julian.  DAV:allprop SEARCH should be defined to
have the same behavior as DAV:allprop.  In particular, it
should not search RFC-3253 properties.

The current proposal for the next revision of 2518 is that
it should only search dead properties and properties 
defined in RFC-2518.

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:01 AM
To: Wallmer, Martin; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Kazeroni, Ladan; Nevermann, Dr., Peter; Pill, Juergen
Subject: RE: DASL and DELTA-V properties



I think we should make SEARCH compatible to RFC3253/ACL -- that is
DAV:allprop behaves just like for PROPFIND.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Wallmer, Martin
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 9:38 AM
> To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
> Cc: Kazeroni, Ladan; Nevermann, Dr., Peter; Pill, Juergen
> Subject: DASL and DELTA-V properties
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> should a DAV:allprop SEARCH on a Delta-V enabled resource return
> all Delta-V
> properties as well? According to
>
> ---
> RFC 3253
>
> 3.11 Additional PROPFIND Semantics
>
>    A DAV:allprop PROPFIND request SHOULD NOT return any of the
>    properties defined by this document.  This allows a versioning server
>    to perform efficiently when a naive client, which does not understand
>    the cost of asking a server to compute all possible live properties,
>    issues a DAV:allprop PROPFIND request.
> ---
>
> PROPFIND should not return them. Is this true for SEARCH as well?
> Is there a
> need to define the behaviour for SEARCH as well?
>
> Regards,
>
> Martin Wallmer
> Research & Development
> Software AG 			++49 6151 92 1831
> Uhlandstr. 12
> D 64297 Darmstadt
>
>