RE: DASL and DELTA-V properties

I was assuming that you were referring to a DAV:allprop in the
"WHERE" clause (i.e. find this string in all properties).
Thus my statement that "DAV:allprop SEARCH should not search
RFC-3253 properties".

If you were referring to the use of DAV:allprop in the "SELECT" clause,
then as Julian points out, it should not report RFC-3253 properties
(but should search whatever is specified in the WHERE clause).

And Julian's sed statement is of course correct (thanks, Julian!).

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:28 AM
To: Clemm, Geoff; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Kazeroni, Ladan; Nevermann, Dr., Peter; Wallmer, Martin
Subject: RE: DASL and DELTA-V properties


Wait-a-minute :-)

> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:19 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: Kazeroni, Ladan; Nevermann, Dr., Peter; Wallmer, Martin
> Subject: RE: DASL and DELTA-V properties
>
>
>
> I agree with Julian.  DAV:allprop SEARCH should be defined to
> have the same behavior as DAV:allprop.  In particular, it
> should not search RFC-3253 properties.

Yes, it should SEARCH them (if used in the where clause). No, it shouldn't
report them (when select uses allprop).

> The current proposal for the next revision of 2518 is that
> it should only search dead properties and properties
> defined in RFC-2518.

sed s/search/report/