RE: Marshalling Depth > 0 responses for REPORTs, WAS: Replacing t he Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report
"Julian Reschke" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.deltav |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 12:05 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Marshalling Depth > 0 responses for REPORTs, WAS: Replacing > t he Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report > > > > The DAV:locate-by-history report finds any collection member > for that history, not just internal members. In particular, > the example in 5.4.1 shows a Depth:0 (the default) request which > finds the /ws/public/x/test.html member of the /ws/public collection. OK, agreed. Somehow, I wasn't paying attention to the distinction between "collection member" and "internal collection member". > So a DAV:locate-by-history report only makes sense with the > default Depth header value of "0". Yes. > What report are you thinking of that makes sense with a non-zero > depth, but which can only be applied to collections? None (anymore), currently.