RE: Marshalling Depth > 0 responses for REPORTs, WAS: Replacing t he Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report

"Julian Reschke" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.deltav
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 12:05 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Marshalling Depth > 0 responses for REPORTs, WAS: Replacing
> t he Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report
>
>
>
> The DAV:locate-by-history report finds any collection member
> for that history, not just internal members.  In particular,
> the example in 5.4.1 shows a Depth:0 (the default) request which
> finds the /ws/public/x/test.html member of the /ws/public collection.

OK, agreed.

Somehow, I wasn't paying attention to the distinction between "collection
member" and "internal collection member".

> So a DAV:locate-by-history report only makes sense with the
> default Depth header value of "0".

Yes.

> What report are you thinking of that makes sense with a non-zero
> depth, but which can only be applied to collections?

None (anymore), currently.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.