RE: Re (2): request for un-version-control feature

> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:55 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Re (2): request for un-version-control feature
>
>
>
> OK, since there are three folks asking for UN-XXX-CONTROL,
> I'm willing to withdraw my objection since I'm the only one
> objecting.
>
> So now the main question is: should this go in the
> next revision of 3253, or should it be a separate draft?
> (Either one is OK with me).

I think it would be best to collect all "common" extensions to DeltaV into a
separate draft. Once it's stable and depending on the timeline for
RFC3253bis,  we can decide either to move contents into RFC3253bis or to
publish it separately.

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760