RE: Re (3): request for un-version-control feature

> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:45 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re (3): request for un-version-control feature
>
>
>
> "Julian Reschke" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > "Clemm, Geoff" <[email protected]>
> > > OK, since there are three folks asking for UN-XXX-CONTROL,
> > > I'm willing to withdraw my objection since I'm the only one
> > > objecting.
> > >
> > > So now the main question is: should this go in the
> > > next revision of 3253, or should it be a separate draft?
> > > (Either one is OK with me).
> >
> > I think it would be best to collect all "common" extensions to
> DeltaV into a
> > separate draft. Once it's stable and depending on the timeline for
> > RFC3253bis,  we can decide either to move contents into RFC3253bis or to
> > publish it separately.
> Sounds fine to me. BTW, is there already an "common" extensions draft ?

No, not yet.

> Then there would be a search for volunteers to do a draft for
UNVERSION-CONTROL
> and UNBASELINE-CONTROL.
> Lisa, Julian, others or should I give it a try ? I couldn't
> promise to do it the next
> couple of days but it's not that urgent I guess.

That would be great. Let me know if I can assist with rfc RFC2629 machinery
(RFC in XML), if you happen to prefer that to Word or plain text.

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760