RE: BIND and DAV:checkout-set property

"Nevermann, Dr., Peter" <[email protected]> wrote on 
09/01/2003 07:00:39 AM:

> > (I suggest to) store the URI that the CHECKOUT 
> > request was applied to.  This is likely to be the 
> > behavior that is most expected by clients that are 
> > not written with multiple bindings in mind.
 
> What happens, if the URI that the CHECKOUT request was applied to 
> becomes unvalid - e.g. because of UNBIND somewhere above in the 
> hierarchy.

By the definition of the DAV:checkout-set property, in case of an
REBIND/MOVE or a UNBIND/DELETE, the server would
have to update the DAV:checkout-set to ensure that it correctly
identifies (i.e. has valid URLs for) the current set of checked-out
resources.

> If I still have a path to the resource, should UNCHECKOUT
> or CHECKIN still work with the alternate path?

Yes.

Cheers,
Geoff