RE: resourcetype for an activity

> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Alison Macmillan
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 7:48 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: DAV:resourcetype for an activity
>
>
>
> Section 13.1 of the spec says that the DAV:resourcetype of an activity
> must be DAV:activity. This would seem to disallow an implementation
> where the resourcetype was, say:
>
> <resourcetype xmlns="DAV:">
>   <activity/>
>   <collection/>
> </resourcetype>
>
> Is there a reason for saying that an activity's resourcetype must be
> (rather than include) DAV:activity?

No. In fact, I think this is what RFC3253 *should* be saying (similar
considerations apply to version history resources).

Geoff, I think this should be on the errata list.

Julian


--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760