Re: Deleting an activity
Werner Donné <[email protected]> Tue, 30 May 2006 10:49:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.deltav |
|---|---|
| Organization | Re BVBA |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Manfred, Shouldn't then a pre-condition be added in section 13.8 of RFC 3253, analogous to the one in section 3.13? Regards, Werner. Manfred Baedke wrote: > Hi Werner, >=20 > This is of course allowed, IMHO. More generally, a server is allowed to > reject the deletion of any resource for whatever reason. >=20 > Regards, > Manfred >=20 > Werner Donn=E9 wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When an activity is deleted all references to it should be removed. >> Versions that have the activity in their activity-set, for example, >> should have their activity-set updated. Versions, which were created >> on a branch represented by the activity, all of the sudden are not >> on that branch anymore and in an implicit way. This seems rather >> strange and dangerous. Would it be allowed to reject the deletion >> of the activity in this case? >> >> Regards, >> >> Werner. >> =20 >=20 >=20 --=20 Werner Donn=E9 -- Re Engelbeekstraat 8 B-3300 Tienen tel: (+32) 486 425803 e-mail: [email protected]