Re: Deleting an activity

Werner DonnĂ© <[email protected]> Tue, 30 May 2006 10:49:15 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.deltav
Organization Re BVBA
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Manfred,

Shouldn't then a pre-condition be added in section 13.8 of RFC 3253,
analogous to the one in section 3.13?

Regards,

Werner.

Manfred Baedke wrote:
> Hi Werner,
>=20
> This is of course allowed, IMHO. More generally, a server is allowed to
> reject the deletion of any resource for whatever reason.
>=20
> Regards,
> Manfred
>=20
> Werner Donn=E9 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When an activity is deleted all references to it should be removed.
>> Versions that have the activity in their activity-set, for example,
>> should have their activity-set updated. Versions, which were created
>> on a branch represented by the activity, all of the sudden are not
>> on that branch anymore and in an implicit way. This seems rather
>> strange and dangerous. Would it be allowed to reject the deletion
>> of the activity in this case?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Werner.
>>  =20
>=20
>=20

--=20
Werner Donn=E9  --  Re
Engelbeekstraat 8
B-3300 Tienen
tel: (+32) 486 425803	e-mail: [email protected]