Re: Preconditions and the responsedescription element
Werner Donné <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:03:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.deltav |
|---|---|
| Organization | Re |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
No, I'm not. It is just a remark about a defensive way to extend a content model. Regards, Werner. Julian Reschke wrote: > Werner Donn=E9 schrieb: >> Adding the error element to the response element is indeed >> nicer, but it would have been safer to add it after all >> "old" elements in the content model, as it was done for the >> location element. Current clients which don't ignore unknown >> elements that intervene in an existing content model different >> from "ANY", will break. It is likely that such clients simply >> consume the elements they know in the known order and then stop. >=20 > Well, those clients are broken anyway. I don't see any point in adaptin= g > to them. >=20 > Are you aware of clients with that problem? >=20 > Best regards, Julian >=20 >=20 --=20 Werner Donn=E9 -- Re Engelbeekstraat 8 B-3300 Tienen tel: (+32) 486 425803 e-mail: [email protected]