Re: LABEL method and Multi-Status
Manfred Baedke <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:32:52 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.deltav |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Werner, if COPY failed for the resource identified by the request uri, it could=20 not be successful for any resource. This is not the case with LABEL. Regards, Manfred Werner Donn=E9 wrote: > Hi, > > For the LABEL method RFC 3253 says: > > "If a Depth header is included and the request fails > on any resource, the response MUST be a 207 Multi-Status > that identifies all resources for which the request has > failed." > > For the COPY method RFC 2518 says: > > "If an error in executing the COPY method occurs with a > resource other than the resource identified in the > Request-URI then the response MUST be a 207 (Multi-Status)." > > This seems to be inconsistent. Contrary to the LABEL method, > the COPY would not return a Multi-Status if the Request-URI > is the only one with an error or when the Depth header is "0", > in which case there can't be another resource with an error. > > Regards, > > Werner. > =20