Interface MTU Option (round 2)
Richard Patterson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHL_VyAN7Ef9AXZZZmX8WhspaO3xYfna1NBUnbbTOsO4CnHEzQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I found this old thread on the topic, but it didn't seem to go anywhere: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/?gbt=1&index=3VPsKmjMGdqFGFH6jIJey8CnjAk @ Fred T, Ian, any interest from you guys still? It'd be pretty useful for Softwire46/IPv4aaS use-cases, to signal to CEs that they can use >1500 byte Interface MTUs, allowing for the additional overhead introduced by the translation/encapsulation. -Rich _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg