Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by December 11, 2023
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <22596.1703631582@localhost> |
Bernie Volz <[email protected]> wrote: > If you want to report upstream, why not just relay the notification? a) because often the local server actually needs to keep it's own database. b) because it might need to filter based upon which addresses are being reported about. For instance, filter out ULAs, but keep GUAs. c) it seems to me like the local server should perhaps be taking responsability for the delivery. but, I agree that relaying upstream might be the better solution. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 515 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFKBAEBCgA0FiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmWLWt4WHG1jcitpZXRm QHNhbmRlbG1hbi5jYQAKCRCAi3D73dDdZeqUB/9Ll9RXJwJpfdmvurg220ztVCw6 5eFxN1HiWro97LPNQ3jptkMz2vm6FcCose6AKmZjs0S0YPzHsEcT3YyHO898iBNn sisL3UXsCfLfCjhqG8Xqt0zDbmdFgEbYZSCCoWrl/10zav0m+MSXDmmd2wjH2IE1 NT9RtBvwI113m4rOTY/4JlSHF0eTN6emahEGMFoUcUdv01hx2zUR//SpVPNc3TrL 1LALNPx38B5PaXe+0JACprzfTWFg852sLmriAW3uQbHZPVjvlZv+qk33Th8zxlgC TllLjW5J2jaJP/XSv5qV5YDUq6bJugGMwdRwr9wa0cv49simanN9pNhzI0LT =/5pm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----