Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by December 11, 2023
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <23223.1703869513@localhost> |
Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the SNAC use case would have to be clearly motivated: someone would > have to be asking for it not because they think it should happen in theory, > but because they need it to deploy stub networks in their specific > environment. Personally I’m skeptical that there is a need for this, but it > will be interesting to see. If it were to happen, how would you like the stub router to behave if it receives ADDR-REG-INFORM? That's all we have to say right now. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 515 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFKBAEBCgA0FiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmWO/EkWHG1jcitpZXRm QHNhbmRlbG1hbi5jYQAKCRCAi3D73dDdZaX3B/9TOYIY5XvcNUQGiat47fHg+xy4 nsDl3W96633reUB4DFtV35Grr88yAyLrKjgtIrYeYVyUrEJM5Et3ZZOLXtMUzJYB J+re/AP2nZMw/1QswHqe3nD4ovCf00zv5ifsLZwU8gNwLSSU463nFOfWvi6YFKwL YbGoe8x2oDykmfAgYopClIcTIoaoWD7s2EsUTVZyGCsojQOOSTqIbyH7Ubyj/V3e NWFGv5ZitWqYTpQ2ZEINLmjoywjfLP/AdhEUmwVJ+TP7jIFdHxLEmglISzcmc7s2 nvdludObUSMpU6IOKYDn6i0oG+eVbXVTOIPZvdg5gdvlK9YCkTAsTxEUdjTj =Hbnq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----