Re: dhc-addr-notification: input required on the client behaviour
Warren Kumari <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHw9_iJErpjX3BizFRjCKLJOsTXVCHBcQdzZQeTGgEKTYAEd4w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:07 AM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 4:15 AM Jen Linkova <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Would the group be OK if -08 contains Bernie's proposal? >> >> Not speaking for the group, obviously, but I think this is the right > choice. Anything else is an unnecessarily complicated protocol fix to a > configuration mistake. > Yup / +1. If the "failure mode" was more harmful then I'd have a different view, but seeing as it is a trivial amount of traffic (and in a weird corner case), I think that it's the right solution…. W _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg