Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification-08.txt

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 2:13 AM Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> }           If revealing other hosts addresses and
> }          alllowing onlink peer-to-peer communication is undesirable for a
> }          given network segment, then layer2 (link-layer) isolation shall
> be
> }          used.
>
> I think you'll get a BCP14 query on "shall" here from the IESG.
> (And I hate putting BCP14 into Security Considerations, so upcasing that
> would not be my choice)
>

Any reason not to just say MUST here? I think it's pretty straightforward.
This mechanism relies on hosts multicasting their own addresses. If you
have a problem with hosts seeing each other's addresses, then you MUST
ensure that that happens at layer 2?

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg