Re: Mail regarding draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification

Jen Linkova <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dhc
Message-ID <CAFU7BASSbOnVnYuKPMQU_M6vVRD67rDX479m72TqJYEfpYvYmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Aditi,

Sorry, I missed your comments and didn't address them in the last
version submitted on Jan 16.
The text will be added to the next version.

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:31 AM Aditi Patange
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I am Aditi Patange from Microsoft. I recently came across ‘Registering Self-generated IPv6 Addresses using DHCPv6’ draft and I would like to surface some questions on behalf of the Windows DHCP client team.

> Nitpick – There is a typing error in Section 4.2.1 Bullet 5 “If there is already a binding between the registered address and another another client, the server SHOULD log the fact and update the binding.” The word “another” is duplicated. 😊

Thanks, will fix it in the next version.

> Section 4.3 doesn’t clarify client behavior if the ADDR-REG-REPLY is discarded. Is the client expected to retransmit ADDR-REG-INFORM until an acceptable ADDR-REG-REPLY is received?

I believe Section 4.5 addresses that:
"To reduce the effects of packet loss on registration, the client
SHOULD retransmit the registration message. Retransmissions SHOULD
follow the standard retransmission logic specified by section 15 of
[RFC8415]....If an ADDR-REG-REPLY message is received for the address
being registered, the client MUST stop retransmission."

So the client retransmits using RFC8415 logic (MRC = 3, so 3
retransmissions), but stops if the reply is received before 3
retransmissions are sent.
Do you think the text is unclear?

> Section 4.5 “However, the client cannot rely on the server acknowledging receipt of the registration message, because the server might not support address registration.”
>
> I am confused by this statement. The client started the registration process because the server responded with OPTION_ADDR_REG_ENABLE indicating that it supports this address registration mechanism. Can you please clarify this statement in the draft?

Oh sorry, this is a leftover from the previous version, where the
client wasn't actively discovering the server-side support. Will
remove the text.

-- 
Cheers, Jen Linkova

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.