Re: recommendation on DHCP6 source port numbers
Ole Troan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bernie, > DHCPv6 has been successfully deployed and this is the first I recall of this kind of discussion/issue. > You would likely also invalidate a lot of implementations with such a change, which is not really in line with advancing this to Full Standard. It’s a lot more important to have the specification clear and unambiguous. I think it has been shown that it isn’t. Happy with whatever solution there is consensus for, but the ambiguity has to be resolved I think. O. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg