[dhcwg] Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc- addr-notification-12: (with COMMENT)

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:18 AM John Scudder via Datatracker
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for this very readable document. I have a few comments I hope may be
> helpful.

<skip>

Thank you John, those comments are very helpful indeed and make the
document more readable.
I've just submitted -13 which contains the corresponding changes.

> ### Acknowledgements
>
> I thought it was weird that the document both credits a previous document
> ("borrows heavily”), listing the authors of that document, AND also adds the
> authors of that document as front-page authors/contributors of the present
> document. So, you are acknowledging... yourselves. ("Good job, me!" ;-)
>
> I mean, it's not a big deal, whatever. But given that the justification for six
> authors is "because the previous document", isn't being listed on the front
> page acknowledgment enough? On the other hand, if the goal is to retain the
> information that draft-ietf-dhc-addr-registration is a predecessor document,
> why not put that in the replaces/replaced-by metadata instead? It's arguably
> both more visible and more useful that way. It *is* possible, I'm pretty sure,
> to have multiple documents in the replaced-by.

Good point! It looks like 'replaced-by' metadata can only be edited by
the WG chairs.
Bernie, Tim - could you please add 'draft-ietf-dhc-addr-registration'
to 'replaces' metadata for draft-wkumari-dhc-addr-notification?

Thank you!
-- 
Cheers, Jen Linkova

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]