[dhcwg] Re: Adoption of draft-porfiri-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6 -ra?

Hello Michael

[and without any hat] I also think that this document would benefit if the RAN use case was removed. I.e., plain DHCPv4 relay over DHCPv6 is interesting enough and more generic.

Regards

-éric


From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, 17 July 2024 at 21:13
To: Jari Arkko <[email protected]>, dhcwg <[email protected]>
Subject: [dhcwg] Re: Adoption of draft-porfiri-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-ra?

I reviewed    draft-porfiri-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6-ra-00
I am confused by the radio uni use cases.  Is this 5G or what exactly?  I
assume because this is coming from Ericsson, that it's 5G.  I guess I'm
surprised DHCPv4 is relevant.

I'm also unclear how/if this requires multi-vendor interoperability.
I think it probably does, but I'd like to understand where the lines are.

It seems like interesting and useful work in eleminating old DHCPv4
infrastructure.  I'm happy to adopt the document into DHC. I think that the
use case could perhaps be a bit more concrete.

Some in the WG have been relucant to work on clearer DHCP server->Relay Agent
options for topology (such as PD delegated), with some claiming that the
current technique of scraping into the DHCP messages by the relay is "running
code". But my impression is that this document would also benefit from.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]