[dhcwg] Re: Adoption of draft-porfiri-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6 -ra?

Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Jul 2024 13:13:30 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.dhc
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Eric Vyncke \(evyncke\) <[email protected]> wrote:
    > [and without any hat] I also think that this document would benefit if
    > the RAN use case was removed. I.e., plain DHCPv4 relay over DHCPv6 is
    > interesting enough and more generic.

I don't know if it needs to go away; it might really be their primary use
case, but I think it needs a bit more detail.

I would generally err on the side of more use cases before adoption.


--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 515 B)