[dhcwg] Re: Actions after the IETF last call of draft-ietf-d hc-rfc8415bis-07

Hi:

For https://github.com/dhcwg/rfc8415bis/pull/15/files#diff-4a21f06c12a0466debfa06a84c156ccdce785a0015275c7fe522bae39b508232R968

 
This table of values used to describe the

“Is” is missing. This table  of values is used …


To me it seems silly to add DHCPv6 before server is several places. We don’t say DHCPv6 client. There are over 800 uses of the word server, and while some are preceded by DHCP, most are not. And, none use “dhcpv6 server” in the main part of the text, so seems to me that these edits badly break the consistency of the document.


You might want to also fix the spelling of “impementations” (implementations), in section 22 - thought not that critical as it will be dropped.


Once we get the document diff, will be easier to see what else to comment on.

- Bernie (from iPad)

> On Feb 12, 2025, at 1:11 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> The pull request dealing with Jim's comments is at:
> https://github.com/dhcwg/rfc8415bis/pull/15/files
> 
> I will merge this "evening" (call it 01:00 UTC Thursday) and post the updated
> document unless I hear objections.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> <signature.asc>

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]