[dhcwg] Re: RFC8415 Erratum?
Tomek Mrugalski <[email protected]> Sat, 15 Mar 2025 10:58:31 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 15.06.2021 17:46, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: > I agree that new documents should make use of the documentation values. > > As far as I know, no one has raised any issues with use of the Cisco enterprise id. > > One issue with not filing something about this issue in RFC8415 is that it may be forgotten should there be a 8415-bis. Reviving old thread. Bernie was right. There was no erratum filled for this and we *almost* missed it. I've opened a PR (https://github.com/dhcwg/rfc8415bis/pull/21) for this and it will be fixed in the next revision. Tomek _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]