[dhcwg] Re: DHCPv6 Virtual Plugfest

Hi Michael,

In our opinion, the failures we observed were not directly a result of
unclear RFC language. Often failures were due to implementations not
sending basic messages at the right times, like Renew and Decline messages,
which we believe is quite clear in the RFC text. As a result, we don't have
any specific edits to suggest.

Thanks,
Spencer

On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 4:14 AM Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> Spencer, thank you for posting that.
> I see lots of green, and also a fair bit of red.
>
> I didn't yet have time to investigate what tests were more red than others,
> but I guess the critical question is whether there was key
> mis-understandings
> in RFC8415(bis) that caused the red.  Is there text that we could still
> perhaps fix, even at this late date in the document process.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
>
>
>
>

-- 

Spencer Couture UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100,
Durham, NH 03824 [email protected]

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]