[dhcwg] Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8 415bis-11.txt

Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Mon, 26 May 2025 13:05:48 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.dhc
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Eric Vyncke \(evyncke\) <[email protected]> wrote:
    > About the 1:1 mapping with 8415, it is indeed a nice to have but some
    > comments during IESG review requested to remove a section, i.e.,
    > breaking this 1:1 mapping. Adding a new section on the appendix for
    > this mapping seems a little too much for me, what could be doable
    > though is to re-add the removed section with a basic text ‘This section
    > is now empty wrt RFC 8415’. I.e., let’s not over do and leave the I-D
    > as it is.

I prefer this solution.
I think that it's the lowest friction way for references to remain useful.
Not just ones in source code or other documents, but also in people's head.

I would not ask the RPC to remove the section.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 515 B)