[dhcwg] Re: New draft: DHCPv6 Recommended IPv6 Address Opt ion
Erik Nygren <[email protected]> Fri, 4 Jul 2025 11:40:30 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc,gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKC-DJhbDDebCJMrLYD_OLdpwTpKqUZBz8xLef8+iSnM38gjbw@mail.gmail.com> |
Thank you for the feedback, Lorenzo. I agree we need to be more clear about the lifetimes. I've pushed a -01 which incorporates this as well as your other feedback, such as adding a use-case/applicability section: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address-00&url2=draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address-01&difftype=--html Best, Erik On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 4:40 PM Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> wrote: > I read the draft and it seems useful for clients that implement DHCPv6 PD. > > I noticed that there is no mention of the lifetimes of the addresses, or > how they are renewed. From reading the text I'd guess that addresses have > exactly the same lifetimes as the prefix that encloses them, but it seems > that the draft should explicitly say that. > > It would probably make sense for the draft to say when networks should use > this option instead of IA_NA. Your email mentions that this option avoids > the need for separate FIB entries for the IA_NA and IA_PD. Presumably > another reason would be that it simplifies client code, because the client > does not need to manage the lifetimes of and renew the address(es) > independently from the prefix. I'd guess maybe it's possible that there are > clients that don't implement IA_NA. > > It occurs to me that this could be used for IPv6 CE routers as well. CE > routers always need to run DHCPv6 PD, and ISP-managed CE routers > additionally need to use IA_NA to get an address on which they can be > managed. This option could be used instead. > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 8:46 PM Erik Nygren <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Following some discussions at past IETFs, I've created a -00 draft for a >> new "DHCPv6 Recommended IPv6 Address Option". >> Abstract: >> >> This document defines a new DHCPv6 option for communicating one or >> more recommended /128 IPv6 address to hosts within an assigned >> prefix. The Recommended Address option allows DHCPv6 servers to >> suggest specific IPv6 addresses that hosts should additionally use >> when configuring addresses within the assigned prefix. >> >> Github: >> https://github.com/enygren/draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address >> HTMLized: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address >> >> The primary use-case for this is hosting, datacenter, and cloud >> environments that want to assign a /64 per host but which also want to >> ensure the host configures one or more addresses (such as for management >> and running services). Operators configuring servers in these environments >> want to be able to ensure that a host will be available on a given /128 >> (for ssh'ing into, putting into DNS as a service endpoint, etc) while >> DHCPv6-PD also means that the host is free to use the rest of the /64 for >> its own purposes (eg, containers, K8s pods, temporary addresses, etc). >> >> Using both IA_PD and IA_NA separately could also meet this use-case, but >> would require multiple FIB entries or would effectively mean assigning a >> /63 per host. Using PD_EXCLUDE and then IA_NA within the PD_EXCLUDE prefix >> was another alternative, but seems messier, more fragile, and outside my >> understanding of the intent of PD_EXCLUDE. >> >> I'd be happy to discuss in Madrid, either in hallways or presenting to >> the DHC, v6ops, and/or 6man WG(s) if time is available. It was suggested >> that DHC would be the best venue to pursue this draft, but I'm open to >> alternatives. >> >> Best, >> >> Erik >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 3:26 PM >> Subject: New Version Notification for >> draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address-00.txt >> To: Erik Nygren <[email protected]> >> >> >> A new version of Internet-Draft >> draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address-00.txt has been successfully >> submitted by Erik Nygren and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address >> Revision: 00 >> Title: DHCPv6 Recommended IPv6 Address Option >> Date: 2025-07-03 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 8 >> URL: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address-00.txt >> Status: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address/ >> HTML: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address-00.html >> HTMLized: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nygren-dhc-recommended-ipv6-address >> >> >> Abstract: >> >> This document defines a new DHCPv6 option for communicating one or >> more recommended /128 IPv6 address to hosts within an assigned >> prefix. The Recommended Address option allows DHCPv6 servers to >> suggest specific IPv6 addresses that hosts should additionally use >> when configuring addresses within the assigned prefix. >> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> > _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]