[dhcwg] Re: New draft: DHCPv6 Recommended IPv6 Address Opt ion
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Fri, 04 Jul 2025 13:43:55 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc,gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lorenzo Colitti <[email protected]> wrote: > I read the draft and it seems useful for clients that implement DHCPv6 > PD. I haven't read it yet, but I will. Erik, are you in a position to implement this option in CE and ISP? > It would probably make sense for the draft to say when networks should > use this option instead of IA_NA. Your email mentions that this option > avoids the need for separate FIB entries for the IA_NA and > IA_PD. Presumably another reason would be that it simplifies client > code, because the client does not need to manage the lifetimes of and > renew the address(es) independently from the prefix. I'd guess maybe > it's possible that there are clients that don't implement IA_NA. > It occurs to me that this could be used for IPv6 CE routers as well. CE > routers always need to run DHCPv6 PD, and ISP-managed CE routers > additionally need to use IA_NA to get an address on which they can be > managed. This option could be used instead. Is there a reason that the IA_NA assigned address couldn't be within the PD? I had a document awhile ago about communicating within IP6CP (for PPPoE) about the CE's DHCP/RA capabilities, so that the "WAN" link could remain unnumbered if possible, with the CE taking an address within the PD allocated. {Cable connections where the WAN link is a flatish emulated ethernet, would need to allocate addresses on that link anyway, so no savings, but also potentially one /64 per neighbourhood} That would turn off RAs on the WAN link, because the CE didn't need that. I stopped working on that document, because I no longer worked on BMCs, so couldn't implement. I agree that reducing the FIB overhead at ISPs important. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 515 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFKBAEBCgA0FiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmhoEtsWHG1jcitpZXRm QHNhbmRlbG1hbi5jYQAKCRCAi3D73dDdZSdGCAC6Z3uhQJBYb8etpgd21XJ7213I Okl7vVVGeu6ebNXlV7i8UT2T00XPQRlxVE1S5uBxYtNYxxX5bCXOEUaJxef88H3y b1fUQ1PNyxj/aRzmu6AynF2kIcEYgIseXKUXtrs9BSmSakLuPjw86R7YsyshDNNK 6ktq2oilqbLkt0i1qby5oriGEAN45xylwpdgiqtdrJK7yFlwdDaifpN07vsGCosg 3GYNnBdWIfGH0Hucpy9sIzSK622dewCn1i3CYxs/HP2coD+SYw9K6Egrv5APih2h hA3CUKy5+1G1kZY2sNxYreokZtPEG6/4IHFKBZwMDgauumMrOKG1BforGwKc =Tj56 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----