[dhcwg] Re: [v6ops] New draft: DHCPv6 Recommended IPv6 Address Option
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Fri, 04 Jul 2025 16:12:24 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc,gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daryll Swer <[email protected]> wrote: > I would be against the idea of insistingly treating DHCPv6 like a > routing protocol. We already have the 'issue' with DHCPv6 HA > <https://blogs.infoblox.com/ipv6-coe/high-availability-dhcpv6/>, across > vendor inter-op, let alone trying to get network operators to do static > ia_pd to begin with, and if the use-case is DC fabrics then, BGP Yes. I wanted to fix this part awhile ago with some proper DHCP relay options. Others didn't care. Maybe it's time to try again. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]