[dhcwg] Re: [v6ops] New draft: DHCPv6 Recommended IPv6 Address Option

Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Fri, 04 Jul 2025 16:12:24 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dhc,gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.ipv6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Daryll Swer <[email protected]> wrote:
    > I would be against the idea of insistingly treating DHCPv6 like a
    > routing protocol. We already have the 'issue' with DHCPv6 HA
    > <https://blogs.infoblox.com/ipv6-coe/high-availability-dhcpv6/>, across
    > vendor inter-op, let alone trying to get network operators to do static
    > ia_pd to begin with, and if the use-case is DC fabrics then, BGP

Yes.
I wanted to fix this part awhile ago with some proper DHCP relay options.
Others didn't care.  Maybe it's time to try again.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     [email protected]  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]