[spring] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribut e-srv6-locator-dhcp-09 (Ends 2025-09-11)
Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Aug 2025 13:22:00 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.spring,gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMMESsxOXHT=ynuruqGd7FCtT89g8h9GCN1RS4CdzkOywCw8ww@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============0377725688762659624== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000845864063d72a80e" --000000000000845864063d72a80e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [cc=E2=80=99iing the dhc WG. Sorry for the extra message, but the datatra= cker doesn=E2=80=99t have a way to add recipients to the automated message.] On August 28, 2025 at 4:20:21=E2=80=AFPM, Alvaro Retana via Datatracker ( [email protected]) wrote: Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dhcp-09 (Ends 2025-09-11) This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for this document. Abstract: In an SRv6 network, each SRv6 Segment Endpoint Node must be assigned an SRv6 locator, and segment IDs are generated within the address space of this SRv6 locator. This document describes a method for assigning SRv6 locators to SRv6 Segment Endpoint Nodes through DHCPv6. File can be retrieved from: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-loca= tor-dhcp/ Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [email protected] in copy. Objections should be motivated and suggestions to resolve them are highly appreciated. Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be found at [3]. Thank you. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ --000000000000845864063d72a80e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <style>body{font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px}</style><div id= =3D"bloop_customfont" style=3D"font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px;m= argin:0px;line-height:auto">[cc=E2=80=99iing the dhc WG.=C2=A0 Sorry for th= e extra message, but the datatracker doesn=E2=80=99t have a way to add reci= pients to the automated message.]</div> <br><p class=3D"airmail_on">On Augu= st 28, 2025 at 4:20:21=E2=80=AFPM, Alvaro Retana via Datatracker (<a href= =3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>) wrote:</p> <blockquote t= ype=3D"cite" class=3D"clean_bq"><span><div><div></div><div> <br>Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dh= cp-09 <br>(Ends 2025-09-11) <br> <br>This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for this document. <br> <br>Abstract: <br> In an SRv6 network, each SRv6 Segment Endpoint Node must be assigned <br> an SRv6 locator, and segment IDs are generated within the address <br> space of this SRv6 locator. This document describes a method for <br> assigning SRv6 locators to SRv6 Segment Endpoint Nodes through <br> DHCPv6. <br> <br>File can be retrieved from: <br><a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-dhc-distr= ibute-srv6-locator-dhcp/">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sprin= g-dhc-distribute-srv6-locator-dhcp/</a> <br> <br>Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with th= e <br>publication of this document by replying to this email keeping <br><a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> in copy. Objecti= ons should be motivated and suggestions to <br>resolve them are highly appreciated. <br> <br>Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the <br>Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in = BCP 79 <br>[1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the <br>provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware= of <br>any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Polic= y can <br>be found at [3]. <br> <br>Thank you. <br> <br>[1] <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/">https://datatra= cker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/</a> <br>[2] <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/">https://datatra= cker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/</a> <br>[3] <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/">https://datat= racker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/</a> <br> <br> <br> <br></div></div></span></blockquote> <div id=3D"bloop_sign_1756412445809798= 912" class=3D"bloop_sign"></div> --000000000000845864063d72a80e-- --===============0377725688762659624== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18Kc3ByaW5nIG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdCAtLSBzcHJpbmdAaWV0Zi5vcmcKVG8gdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUgc2VuZCBhbiBlbWFp bCB0byBzcHJpbmctbGVhdmVAaWV0Zi5vcmcK --===============0377725688762659624==--