[dhcwg] Re: Question about draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Dec 2025 10:42:31 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============7972664202010482712== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote: > The WG/authors might want to look at changing that "SHOULD" to "is > recommended to" because this really has nothing to do with interop or > bits on the wire. Well. If all the clients run multiple state machines, then is more traffic and more work for the servers. We are in last gasps of AUTH48 right now... =2D- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 I=C3=B8T consulti= ng ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmk9iWcACgkQgItw+93Q 3WWoYAf9HV0GRyaFQwsTLIEuw/o8lnnW5iNPYJFdGdHeameqdEByl6BQFo/fBNDu tjnD0RVYhGJ661aTkO25/smIVQkfmAE5jRJb6LA+KknAZhs9kERMp+j7+bWWBpQw pP8xLfuQU5hg1FDTs0SVl5HFA1gCv3McXLnHw1Xwq42INk2iErpLJ5zLJjzfCFBe 0NxxRvbUr32M6NxYgrihW2cyOr7Eq1bxs3OogVTvrC36ezr9yuJM+xEKXrT2jlB3 T2uaQ73j9TPPdLuUD1rtpvICmUnAou3h/s073NCNHb2pNzInVuqFnFA96OXNYViH ECnoavOpzc/AUUbodX/YpvgephgspA== =kWQA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============7972664202010482712== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZGhjd2cgbWFp bGluZyBsaXN0IC0tIGRoY3dnQGlldGYub3JnClRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlIHNlbmQgYW4gZW1haWwg dG8gZGhjd2ctbGVhdmVAaWV0Zi5vcmcK --===============7972664202010482712==--