[dhcwg] Re: Question about draft-ietf-dhc-rfc8415bis

Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Dec 2025 10:42:31 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dhc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============7972664202010482712==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote:
    > The WG/authors might want to look at changing that "SHOULD" to "is
    > recommended to" because this really has nothing to do with interop or
    > bits on the wire.

Well. If all the clients run multiple state machines, then is more traffic
and more work for the servers.  We are in last gasps of AUTH48 right now...


=2D-
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 I=C3=B8T consulti=
ng )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide





--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmk9iWcACgkQgItw+93Q
3WWoYAf9HV0GRyaFQwsTLIEuw/o8lnnW5iNPYJFdGdHeameqdEByl6BQFo/fBNDu
tjnD0RVYhGJ661aTkO25/smIVQkfmAE5jRJb6LA+KknAZhs9kERMp+j7+bWWBpQw
pP8xLfuQU5hg1FDTs0SVl5HFA1gCv3McXLnHw1Xwq42INk2iErpLJ5zLJjzfCFBe
0NxxRvbUr32M6NxYgrihW2cyOr7Eq1bxs3OogVTvrC36ezr9yuJM+xEKXrT2jlB3
T2uaQ73j9TPPdLuUD1rtpvICmUnAou3h/s073NCNHb2pNzInVuqFnFA96OXNYViH
ECnoavOpzc/AUUbodX/YpvgephgspA==
=kWQA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--


--===============7972664202010482712==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZGhjd2cgbWFp
bGluZyBsaXN0IC0tIGRoY3dnQGlldGYub3JnClRvIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlIHNlbmQgYW4gZW1haWwg
dG8gZGhjd2ctbGVhdmVAaWV0Zi5vcmcK

--===============7972664202010482712==--