[dhcwg] Re: Request for review: draft-drew-dhc-v4-routed-p refix-00
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It occurred to me while cycling yesterday that provisioning single /32 via DHCP seems like a core part of IPv4-As-A-Service. As such, it seems even more important to be able to do this over DHCPv6. I feel like this ought to be a solved problem in one of the transition technologies. How to get the /32 over/through an IPv6-only network ought also be a solved problem within the various v4-overlay scenarios. Clearly, I must be wrong, or we wouldn't need this? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide ** My working hours and your working hours may be different. ** ** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours ** _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 487 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmqDd4cACgkQgItw+93Q 3WXmzgf/QrppUqyWgr/nHbRwHxH4/mJGl4SLFuuQH4tWfp1fsa7mKgLqd3j51OcG Ot2i+jMDfQgwOUu0L7nX8Qe7XGhAytzApf7eCb+UXpd9qZDLUrPTM9RVQ2Z6gViQ E2bkYZ8LveZbmrGfER9U2haMoGRmwYCuxgetdxAp8sbf3NEYtTFTGvWBF95J525u HvRWmu2ltdiSdpDlcabOMsvag859fwTw/pNSHKahvKaTqR2NuNZOwSCHG4WU/MFt Q0vzj7aOPn1f6HNlt1y3DqPhZYvewv3Iuvm6lbXCanxmXbZZVG58l95x4aqT3m9w MpIGWbZ15L9V9/vPgO42znN32iJlzg== =Yr1e -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----