RE: Modeling of Policing component.
"Andrew Smith" <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:28:29 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.diffserv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I disagree: if you follow an Algorithmic Dropper by a Scheduler (there's an implied Queue in there somewhere), when the Queue starts to get full due to "excess" traffic (arrival - departure > 0 over appropriate time intervals), the Dropper will kick in. That is "policing" (it's doing shaping at the same time of course). Meter->AbsoluteDropper is the more conventional way to think about policing, I agree, but AlgorithmicDropper->Scheduler is also valid. Andrew Smith -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ravikumarb Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:49 AM To: Brian E Carpenter Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Diffserv] Modeling of Policing component. ... We can have an Algorithmic Dropper as part of Policer, but not a Scheduler. The moment we have a Scheduler, what we are doing is Shaping not policing. _______________________________________________ diffserv mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html