RE: Modeling of Policing component.

>> "sqreeek" (that's the sound of the opening of a can of worms): Would
>> you consider evolving the informal model of RFC 3290 into a more
>> formal calculus, 
>
>No. Never. That is an academic topic (no insult intended), not
>something that the IETF should do. 
>
>   Brian

Yeah surprisingly I have to agree with Brian on this one, the last 
thing we want is a model which is formally grounded enough that you 
could actually use it to verify that your equipment was correctly 
implemented. Much better that we don't ever do that sort of thing in 
the IETF, that way we have well defined areas of doubt and uncertainty.

Wait what was I thinking.... oh its the heat...
(our air-conditioning failed and its 95 degrees in my office.... really)
Let me try that again...

Yeah not surprisingly I have to disagree with Brian on this one.....

jon



Jon C. R. Bennett
Chief Engineer
Motorola Broadband Communications Sector
3 Highwood Drive
Tewksbury, MA  01876
978.858.2300/2361 (direct)
978.858.2399 (Fax)



   -export-a-crypto-system-sig -RSA-3-lines-PERL

#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html