RE: Modeling of Policing component.

> Very funny. 

I liked to think it was :-)

> What I said was I thought very clear:

it wasn't

> this isn't sonething we should do in the IETF. 
> Did I say it shouldn't be done? Or that when it
> is done, that the IETF shouldn't use the result? 

I think in fact that is how most people would have
interpreted your statement

> But it should be done rigorously, and that means 
> in an academic context. 

So are you suggesting that the work we did in fixing 
the EF PHB was
a) not rigorous
b) my co-authors and I are ... "academics"... (eeepp :-) or
c) that the work was not "done in the IETF"

the first two I beleive to be untrue and certainly a little insulting.... 
me, an "academic"? never! :-)
and the last is clearly untrue

so could you explain the contradication...... 
or is there no contradication because you don't think 
we should have done the EF work at the IETF either??

jon

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html