RE: Re: Fwd: RE: Fwd: Re: authors 48 hours: RFC 3289<draft-ietf-diffserv-mib-16.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
Fred Baker <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Aug 2002 19:08:53 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.diffserv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 07:41 PM 8/29/2002 -0700, Andrew Smith wrote: >But don't things like this usually wait for a "natural" refresh cycle >e.g. an attempt to move an RFC to Draft standard? there is at least one thing whihc actually needs correction - a range on a variable. _______________________________________________ diffserv mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html