RE: [ipcdn] FW: Dscp and DscpOrAny TCs
"Andrew Smith" <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:05:37 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.diffserv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <094601c2e4ed$510ffea0$1500000a@ANDREWLAPTOP> |
Rich, You wrote: ... > I agree with Wilson when he emphasizes that these Dscp objects in the > various DOCSIS MIB are access filters, not PHB selectors. In fact, such > objects enable the DOCSIS equipment to act precisely as "re-marking boundary > nodes", which are also described in RFC 2474 Section 3, pages 8-9: ... If the pieces of DOCSIS equipment are acting as "re-marking boundary nodes, which are also described in RFC 2474 Section 3, pages 8-9" then shouldn't they, by definition, be implementing the IETF's existing Diffserv MIB RFC 3289 in order to control this functionality? I would hope that your WG would provide a strong argument why IETF should sanction another MIB for this same purpose when this work comes before the IESG for consideration. Andrew Smith _______________________________________________ diffserv mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html