Re: diffserv WG closing

The procedure for this is defined in RFC 3086.
   Brian

Jiang Yuming wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Since the diffserv WG is closing, I am wondering to which WG a diffserv PDB, such as EF PDB, should be proposed.
> 
> Yuming
> 
> >>> Scott  Bradner <[email protected]> 03/08/03 08:48PM >>>
> 
> With the publication of the diffserv PIB the working group is now being closed.
> 
> The working group was very successfull, producing 15 RFCs and technology
> that is widely seen as a key part of the Internet toolbox.
> 
> I want to thank the WG chairs who put so much good work into this effort
> over more years than we thought it would take when we started.
> 
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> diffserv mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
> Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> diffserv mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
> Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter 
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM 
On assignment at the IBM Zurich Laboratory, Switzerland
_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html