RE: (no subject)

Hi,

Please check RFC-3246 which obsoletes RFC-2598. Basically the answer to you question is that
it is not possible to fulfill that requirement over all time intervals. That is why RFC-3246  introduces error terms (E_a and E_p) for packet scale rate guarantee.

Yours,
-Shahram

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hchang [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:00 PM
> To: Diffserv
> Subject: [Diffserv] (no subject)
> 
> 
> hi,i have a question about the EF PHB.
> the EF service must obey the following condition :(rfc 2598) 
> Conditioning the aggregate (via policing and shaping) so that 
> its arrival rate at any node is always less 
> than that node's configured minimum departure rate.
> 	we use traffic conditioners at the edge nodes of the 
> DiffServ domain to achieve this target.
> my question is that if a node has several upstream nodes,for 
> example ,3 upstream nodes, but they are all not the edge 
> nodes.according to the condition,the sum arrival rate from 
> the  3 upstream nodes must less than the configured minimum 
> departure rate,how can we achieve this in a dynamic network state?
> 	
> 	
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> diffserv mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
> Archive: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/curre
> nt/maillist.html
> 

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html