RE: (no subject)

Brian,

To reduce confusions like this, don't you think it is time to remove the obsoleted RFC2598 from the Diffserv Website.

Yours,
-Shahram

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:48 AM
> To: 'hchang'
> Cc: Diffserv
> Subject: Re: [Diffserv] (no subject)
> 
> 
> Please also see RFC 3248, which is an alternative (Informational)
> revision of RFC 2598.
> 
>    Brian
> 
> Shahram Davari wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Please check RFC-3246 which obsoletes RFC-2598. Basically 
> the answer to you question is that
> > it is not possible to fulfill that requirement over all 
> time intervals. That is why RFC-3246  introduces error terms 
> (E_a and E_p) for packet scale rate guarantee.
> > 
> > Yours,
> > -Shahram
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: hchang [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:00 PM
> > > To: Diffserv
> > > Subject: [Diffserv] (no subject)
> > >
> > >
> > > hi,i have a question about the EF PHB.
> > > the EF service must obey the following condition :(rfc 2598)
> > > Conditioning the aggregate (via policing and shaping) so that
> > > its arrival rate at any node is always less
> > > than that node's configured minimum departure rate.
> > >       we use traffic conditioners at the edge nodes of the
> > > DiffServ domain to achieve this target.
> > > my question is that if a node has several upstream nodes,for
> > > example ,3 upstream nodes, but they are all not the edge
> > > nodes.according to the condition,the sum arrival rate from
> > > the  3 upstream nodes must less than the configured minimum
> > > departure rate,how can we achieve this in a dynamic network state?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> diffserv mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
> Archive: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/curre
nt/maillist.html

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html